TLDNR and why you should never ever use it. Ever.
Posted on June 30th, 2010
If there’s one thing that really annoys me, it’s seeing “TLDNR” posted anywhere, ever*.
“TLDNR” is a sign of everything that’s wrong with the internet, in my opinion. It marries poor grammar with downright rudeness and implies that any piece of writing over a screen’s length is not worth the effort of reading. An acronym coined by the kind of moron that hangs about online with nary a good word to say about anyone, TLDNR stands for ‘too long did not read’.
First of all, congratu-frickin-lations for coming up with that, sounds as though you had a team of Oxford scholars working round the clock on it. Secondly, it’s not really a sentence, is it? Ok, so maybe it contains all the appropriate types of word required to make up a sentence, but it’s quite clearly caveman speak. Me tarzan you jane, too long did not read, me hungry want food. See what I mean?
I see where this has come from: simply using an acronym wasn’t quick enough for you, your time is so precious that you can’t even spare the three seconds it takes to form a proper sentence to abbreviate. A quick look on, er, Wiktionary reveals that, hey! There are variants! Some favour the punctuated acronym, whether it’s the insertion of a colon, semi-colon or, for no fathomable reason, a forward slash after ‘long’. Hell, you can even use TLDR (too long didn’t read) if you’re too busy to spare the millisecond it takes to type an N. Here’s an idea, save yourself even more time by just not commenting at all. What do I care if you didn’t read something? In fact, let’s formalise this: if you don’t comment on it, I’ll just assume you didn’t read it. Deal? There, saved you another eight precious seconds to spend trolling about elsewhere online.
The people who coined TLDNR are no doubt the same people who rfs2wst txtmsg spc on vwls so they don’t have to shell out the bank-breaking sum of 20 pence instead of 10. In the end, their messages make no sense and leave them sounding like an illiterate teenager. We should all agree to delete them unceremoniously and never give them another thought. (Sorry Mum.)

But why, general moronity aside, aren’t we allowed to be wordy on the internet? (I say ‘we’ as if I belong to that club of bloggers who actually have readers and not just words. I realise also that the eight people who do actually read this have probably given up by now. Understandable. What was I saying again? Oh yeah:) why does everything has to be so quick and short and sharp? It’s as though there’s an unwritten rule that decrees we shalt not make a point elegantly in ten words if we can do it clumsily in three.
The real problem is that this stupid acronym assumes that long = boring. It is not so! There are plenty of brief, boring blog posts and news pieces online – hell, I’ve written a good few of them. The reverse is also true; but people’s attention spans are so distressingly short now, it’s as though we just can’t be bothered to concentrate on something for longer than three seconds. Why bother reading something properly when you can get the gist from the headline and a quick skim of the first paragraph? And why waste time actually reading something if you can leap straight into the comments and berate the author for putting time and effort into something that you couldn’t be bothered to read instead?
Me, I like a long read. I like the twisting winding tangent-y ramblings of the witty, the sharp, the passionate and the interesting – even if they consist of 16,000 brilliantly nonsensical words about a videogames show in which I have little-to-no interest.
Now, Twitter; that’s a different kettle of fish. I hate the verbose on Twitter. If you find yourself repeatedly taking three or four tweets to make your one point, you need to forget Twitter and get yourself a blog. The occasional two-tweet case is acceptable. I’ve even been known to do it myself, you know.
You know why there’s no acronym for ‘Wow, this was long but totally worth it as I enjoyed reading it a lot and it was generally really interesting, good job person who wrote it’? Because if you actually read something, you get to actually form your own opinion, which you can then actually legitimately post as a comment and I won’t loathe you forever even if it’s really mean.
Also it would be stupid: WTWLBTWIAIERIALAIWGRIGJPWWI would never catch on.
–
Inevitably, some fucking comedian is going to post a TLDNR-or-variant comment now. Good imagination skills, internet. You know what else we could try? Selling pre-sliced bread and a box that sits in your living room and displays moving pictures.
*except, annoyingly, the t-shirt from BustedTees that the above image is taken from.

For what it’s worth (or FWIW, as the kids say), I read every word of that and I couldn’t agree more.
I actually tend to scan the less interesting, newsy sections of my feeds quickly, and bookmark longer-form writing to read at my leisure later, and invariably the longer, more-considered pieces are far more interesting than the quick blog posts which tend to be recycled images or updates re-blogged from other sources, which just ends up turning the internet into an echo chamber in search of a rocketing hit-count.
It is worth remembering that the sort of lackwit that would use TLDNR is the sort of person who reads the METRO on the tube every single morning and the EVENING STANDARD on the way home instead of, you know, actually exercising some choice or thought by buying a book, revelling instead in the sort of slapped-together shoddy “journalism” largely gleaned from a lazy dig through Wikipedia and RSS feeds for easy-to-mentally-digest trivia and dubious factoids. (That sentence was far, far too long, I know).
This response has now become ripe fodder for someone to call “TLDNR” on it. The irony doesn’t escape me. Shutting up now.
I have read the original post and first response in full. Both were interesting.
I will now make some tea and have a couple of Hob Nobs.
Good day to you.
Drew
A great post, and something I’ve been wondering about too. After all, if the internet is supposed to be the future of reading (a thought that fills most book/newspaper lovers with dread), then it is imperative that quality writing of any length is encouraged and rewarded. Otherwise we may experience the evolution (or devolution) of language into something so economical and “efficient” that it becomes soulless at the same time.
Sorry pet hate, but TL;DR is not an acronym as the initials don’t spell a word. Those in glass houses…
Oh my, you’re so right – I didn’t even know that. So, TLDNR is an initialism, which isn’t half so catchy as acronym but much more accurate.
Well well, you learn something new every day.
Or just an abbreviation, initialism doesn’t really seem to be a word. Gosh language is pesky.
There should be a word to describe a non-acronym initial letter abbreviation! I’m not sure there is…
When I, a poor student first got my mobile about 7-8 years ago, I had to limit the characters due to the 300 texts a month limit. As such, numbers and symbols came into the picture and we had to use ’2′ to replace ‘to’ and ‘too’ etc. Sentences became grammatically incorrect and singular/plural forms were thrown out of the window.
Recently I got my new andriod mobile(yay!). Whenever I type a very long message exceeding 3 texts at a go, it gets converted into a multimedia message! (WTH) So I had to convert back to my old ways!(not again!)
So one thing for certain, it’s not pure human nature(aka laziness) that’s causing this abbreviations and shortening of words/phrases but rather £ and poor logic programming(=environmental?) factors which pushes folks towards this ‘short-cut’ behaviour but also perhaps in this fast moving world accompanied by the constant amount of time we have, we decide that we need to reduce/minimize the length of our activities so as to cramp even more events into our calendar.
Quantity or quality, you decide :)
I read the entire article and all the comments :O and to be honest, I usually do, if it’s an interesting read. And far too often I see comments saying “sorry didnt read it all. Agree/disagree with your first sentence” or similar, yet the remainder of the article may have contradicted it, or elaborated why. I can’t think of a specific item I’ve read lately but, there was something that I disagreed with on the first sentence/paragraph but, then the writer went into why they thought that and I did agree with those points and it was an interesting read and of course, because there was reasons/explanations it was too long for some to read and they said so and that they disagreed. Sigh.
That said, I haven’t actually seen anyone say TLDNR or similar. Those who do complain/don’t read at least manage to write it properly.
(PS, I don’t use Twitter much, 140 characters just isn’t enough, even with abbreviating lol.)